Product Code Database
Example Keywords: take -slacks $92-123
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Iranian Peoples
Tag Wiki 'Iranian Peoples'.
Tag

Iranian peoples, or Iranic peoples, are the collective ethnolinguistic groups

(1988). 9780521228046, Cambridge University Press. .
who are identified chiefly by their native usage of any of the Iranian languages, which are a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages within the Indo-European language family.

The Proto-Iranians are believed to have emerged as a separate branch of the in around the mid-2nd millennium BC. At their peak of expansion in the mid-1st millennium BC, the territory of the Iranian peoples stretched across the entire ; from the in the west to the in the east and the in the south.: "From the first millennium b.c., we have abundant historical, archaeological and linguistic sources for the location of the territory inhabited by the Iranian peoples. In this period the territory of the northern Iranians, they being equestrian nomads, extended over the whole zone of the steppes and the wooded steppes and even the semi-deserts from the Great Hungarian Plain to the Ordos in northern China."

The ancient Iranian peoples who emerged after the 1st millennium BC include the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , the , and likely the , among other Iranian-speaking peoples of , Central Asia, , and the Eastern Steppe.

In the 1st millennium AD, their area of settlement, which was mainly concentrated in the steppes and deserts of , was significantly reduced due to the expansion of the , the , the , and the ; many were subjected to

(1977). 9780804709101, Stanford University Press.
and .
(2025). 9781845115524, I.B. Tauris. .
Modern Iranian peoples include the , the , the , the , the Mazanderanis, the , the , the , the Persians, the Tats, the , the , the , the , and the . Their current distribution spreads across the Iranian Plateau stretching from the in the north to the in the south and from eastern Anatolia in the west to western Xinjiang in the east covering a region that is sometimes called , representing the extent of the Iranian-speaking peoples and the reach of their geopolitical and cultural influence.: "Iran means all lands and people where Iranian languages were and are spoken, and where in the past, multi-faceted Iranian cultures existed."


Name
The term Iran derives directly from () and Parthian (). The Middle Iranian terms ērān and aryān are oblique plural forms of ēr- (in Middle Persian) and ary- (in Parthian), both deriving from (𐎠𐎼𐎡𐎹), () and Proto-Iranian *arya-.

There have been many attempts to qualify the verbal root of ar- in Old Iranian arya-. The following are according to 1957 and later linguists:

  • Emmanuel Laroche (1957): ("fitting", "proper").
    Old Iranian arya- being descended from Proto-Indo-European , meaning "(skillfully) assembler".Laroche. 1957. Proto-Iranian *arya- descends from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) , a yo-adjective to a root "to assemble skillfully", present in Greek harma "chariot", Greek aristos, (as in ""), Latin ars "art", etc.
  • Georges Dumézil (1958): ar- "to share" (as a union).
  • Harold Walter Bailey (1959): ar- "to beget" ("born", "nurturing").
  • Émil Benveniste (1969): ("companionable").

Unlike the ārya- ( ), the Old Iranian term has solely an ethnic meaning.G. Gnoli, "Iranian Identity as a Historical Problem: the Beginnings of a National Awareness under the Achaemenians", in The East and the Meaning of History. International Conference (23–27 November 1992), Roma, 1994, pp. 147–67. Today, the Old Iranian arya- remains in ethno-linguistic names such as Iran, , , and .H. W. Bailey, "Arya" in Encyclopedia Iranica. Excerpt: "ARYA an ethnic epithet in the Achaemenid inscriptions and in the Zoroastrian Avestan tradition. Also accessed online in May 2010.Dalby, Andrew (2004), Dictionary of Languages, Bloomsbury,

In the Iranian languages, the gentilic is attested as a self-identifier included in ancient inscriptions and the literature of . The earliest attested reference to the word arya- occurs in the Bistun Inscription of the 6th century BC. The inscription of Bistun (or Behistun; ) describes itself to have been composed in Arya language. As is also the case for all other Old Iranian language usage, the arya of the inscription does not signify anything but Iranian. cf. , p. 2.

In royal Old Persian inscriptions, the term arya- appears in three different contexts:

  • As the name of the language of the Old Persian version of the inscription of in the Bistun Inscription.
  • As the ethnic background of Darius the Great in inscriptions at and Susa (Dna, Dse) and the ethnic background of in the inscription from Persepolis (Xph).
  • As the definition of the God of Iranians, , in the version of the Bistun Inscription.
In the Dna and Dse, Darius and Xerxes describe themselves as "an Achaemenid, a Persian, son of a Persian, and an Aryan, of Aryan stock".R. G. Kent. Old Persian. Grammar, texts, lexicon. 2nd ed., New Haven, Conn. Although Darius the Great called his language arya- ("Iranian"), modern scholars refer to it as Old Persian because it is the ancestor of the modern Persian language.
(1975). 9781139054966

The inscription erected by the command of gives a more clear description. The languages used are Parthian, Middle Persian, and Greek. In Greek inscription says "ego ... tou Arianon ethnous despotes eimi", which translates to "I am the king of the kingdom ( nation) of the Iranians". In Middle Persian, Shapur says "ērānšahr xwadāy hēm" and in Parthian he says "aryānšahr xwadāy ahēm".MacKenzie D.N. Corpus inscriptionum Iranicarum Part. 2., inscription of the Seleucid and Parthian periods of Eastern Iran and Central Asia. Vol. 2. Parthian, London, P. Lund, Humphries 1976–2001

The Avesta clearly uses airiia- as an ethnic name ( 1; 13.143–44, etc.), where it appears in expressions such as airyāfi daiŋˊhāvō ("Iranian lands"), airyō šayanəm ("land inhabited by Iranians"), and airyanəm vaējō vaŋhuyāfi dāityayāfi ("Iranian stretch of the good Dāityā"). In the late part of the (Videvdat 1), one of the mentioned homelands was referred to as which approximately means "expanse of the Iranians". The homeland varied in its geographic range, the area around (Pliny's view) and even the entire expanse of the ('s designation).

The Old Persian and Avestan evidence is confirmed by the Greek sources. , in his Histories, remarks about the Iranian Medes that "Medes were called anciently by all people Arians" (7.62). In Armenian sources, the Parthians, Medes and Persians are collectively referred to as Iranians.R.W. Thomson. History of Armenians by Moses Khorenat’si. Harvard University Press, 1978. Pg 118, pg 166 Eudemus of Rhodes (Dubitationes et Solutiones de Primis Principiis, in Platonis Parmenidem) refers to "the Magi and all those of Iranian ( áreion) lineage". (1.94.2) considers Zoroaster ( Zathraustēs) as one of the Arianoi.

, in his (1st century AD), mentions of the , Persians, and of the Iranian Plateau and of antiquity:The "Aryan" Language, Gherardo Gnoli, Instituto Italiano per l'Africa e l'Oriente, Roma, 2002

The Bactrian (a Middle Iranian language) inscription of (the founder of the ) at Rabatak, which was discovered in 1993 in an unexcavated site in the Afghan province of , clearly refers to this Eastern Iranian language as Arya.N. Sims-Williams, "Further notes on the Bactrian inscription of Rabatak, with the Appendix on the name of Kujula Kadphises and VimTatku in Chinese". Proceedings of the Third European Conference of Iranian Studies (Cambridge, September 1995). Part 1: Old and Middle Iranian Studies, N. Sims-Williams, ed. Wiesbaden, pp 79-92

All this evidence shows that the name Arya was a collective definition, denoting peoples who were aware of belonging to the one ethnic stock, speaking a common language, and having a religious tradition that centered on the cult of Ohrmazd.

The academic usage of the term Iranian is distinct from the state of and its various citizens (who are all Iranian by nationality), in the same way that the term Germanic peoples is distinct from . Some inhabitants of Iran are not necessarily ethnic Iranians by virtue of not being speakers of Iranian languages.


Iranian vs. Iranic
Some scholars such as John Perry prefer the term Iranic as the name for the linguistic family of this category (many of which are spoken outside Iran), while Iranian for anything about the country Iran. He uses the same analogue as in differentiating from Germanic or differentiating and .: ""Iranian" is still the more commonly used term; I prefer "Iranic," as being more consistent with analogous categories such as "Turkic" and "Germanic" and unambiguous with "Iranian" in the sense "pertaining to the country or state of Iran": cf. Indic/Indian, Italic/Italian" German scholar Martin Kümmel also argues for the same distinction of Iranian from Iranic.: "Iranic for Iranian: To avoid confusion with terms related to the country or territory of Iran (especially in recent geneticist papers speaking of prehistoric "Iranian" populations almost certainly not "Iranian" in the linguistic sense)"


History and settlement

Indo-European roots

Proto-Indo-Iranians
The Proto-Indo-Iranians are commonly identified with the Sintashta culture and the subsequent Andronovo culture within the broader Andronovo horizon, and their homeland with an area of the that borders the on the west and the on the east.

The Indo-Iranian migrations took place in two waves. The first wave consisted of the Indo-Aryan migration through the Bactria-Margiana Culture, also called "Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex," into the Levant, founding the kingdom; and a migration south-eastward of the Vedic people, over the Hindu Kush into northern India. The Indo-Aryans split off around 1800–1600 BC from the Iranians, whereafter they were defeated and split into two groups by the Iranians, who dominated the Central Eurasian steppe zone and "chased the to the extremities of Central Eurasia." One group were the Indo-Aryans who founded the kingdom in northern Syria; () the other group were the Vedic people. Christopher I. Beckwith suggests that the , an Indo-European people of in , were also of Indo-Aryan origin.

The second wave is interpreted as the Iranian wave, and took place in the third stage of the Indo-European migrations from 800 BC onwards.


Sintashta–Petrovka culture
The Sintashta culture, also known as the Sintashta–Petrovka culture. or Sintashta–Arkaim culture,. is a archaeological culture of the northern on the borders of and , dated to the period 2100–1800 . It is probably the archaeological manifestation of the Indo-Iranian language group.

The Sintashta culture emerged from the interaction of two antecedent cultures. Its immediate predecessor in the Ural-Tobol steppe was the , an offshoot of the cattle-herding that moved east into the region between 2800 and 2600 BC. Several Sintashta towns were built over older Poltavka settlements or close to Poltavka cemeteries, and Poltavka motifs are common on Sintashta pottery. Sintashta also shows the influence of the late , a collection of settlements in the zone north of the Sintashta region that were also predominantly . Allentoft et al. (2015) also found close genetic relationship between peoples of Corded Ware culture and Sintashta culture.

The earliest known have been found in Sintashta burials, and the culture is considered a strong candidate for the origin of the technology, which spread throughout the and played an important role in .. Sintashta settlements are also remarkable for the intensity of mining and carried out there, which is unusual for a steppe culture..

Because of the difficulty of identifying the remains of Sintashta sites beneath those of later settlements, the culture was only recently distinguished from the Andronovo culture. It is now recognised as a separate entity forming part of the 'Andronovo horizon'.


Andronovo culture
The Andronovo culture is a collection of similar local cultures that flourished c. 1800–900 BC in western and the west . It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or archaeological horizon. The name derives from the village of Andronovo (), where in 1914, several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. The older Sintashta culture (2100–1800), formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon. At least four sub-cultures of the Andronovo horizon have been distinguished, during which the culture expands towards the south and the east:
  • Sintashta-Petrovka-Arkaim (Southern , northern , 2200–1600 BC)
    • the fortification of ca. 1800 BC in Chelyabinsk Oblast
    • the Petrovka settlement fortified settlement in Kazakhstan
    • the nearby settlement dated to the 17th century
  • Alakul (2100–1400 BC) between and ,
  • Fedorovo (1500–1300 BC) in southern Siberia (earliest evidence of and )
    • Beshkent-Vakhsh (1000–800 BC)

The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, in the - interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the depression, with some sites as far west as the southern , overlapping with the area of the earlier Afanasevo culture. Additional sites are scattered as far south as the (), the () and the (). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the . In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as .

Most researchers associate the Andronovo horizon with early Indo-Iranian languages, though it may have overlapped the early -speaking area at its northern fringe.

The archeological features of the are seen as the results of the intrusion of nomadic Indo-Iranians from the northern Andronovo culture and their interaction with indigenous traditions from the preceding BMAC culture.


Scythians and Persians
From the late 2nd millennium BC to early 1st millennium BC the Iranians had expanded from the , and Iranian peoples such as , , and populated the .I. M. Diakonoff in .

Scythian tribes, along with , and populated the steppes north of the . The and Sarmatian tribes were spread across Great Hungarian Plain, South-Eastern Ukraine, Russias , , ,

(2004). 9780791082478, Infobase. .
Uralic regions and the ,Carl Waldman, Catherine Mason. "Encyclopedia of European Peoples", Infobase Publishing, 2006. p 692Prudence Jones. Nigel Pennick. "A History of Pagan Europe", Routledge, 11 okt. 2. p 10Ion Grumeza "Dacia: Land of Transylvania, Cornerstone of Ancient Eastern Europe", University Press of America, 16 May 2009. pp 19–21 while other Scythian tribes, such as the , spread as far east as , China.


Western and Eastern Iranians
The division into an "" and a "" group by the early 1st millennium is visible in vs. Old Persian, the two oldest known Iranian languages. The Old Avestan texts known as the are believed to have been composed by , the founder of , with the (c. 1500 BC – 1100 BC) as a candidate for the development of Eastern Iranian culture.


Western Iranian peoples
During the 1st centuries of the 1st millennium BC, the ancient Persians established themselves in the western portion of the Iranian Plateau and appear to have interacted considerably with the Elamites and , while the also entered in contact with the . Remnants of the and show their common Proto-Iranian roots, emphasized in Strabo and Herodotus' description of their languages as very similar to the languages spoken by the Bactrians and in the east. "The Geography of Strabo" – University of Chicago. . Retrieved 4 June 2006. Following the establishment of the Achaemenid Empire, the Persian language (referred to as " Farsi" in Persian after being changed from Parsi) spread from Pars or (Persia) to various regions of the Empire, with the modern dialects of Iran, Afghanistan (also known as Dari) and Central-Asia (known as ) descending from Old Persian.

At first, the Western Iranian peoples in the were dominated by the various empires. An alliance of the Medes with the , and rebelling Babylonians, , , and , helped the Medes to capture in 612 BC, which resulted in the eventual collapse of the Neo-Assyrian Empire by 605 BC.A. Leo Oppenheim, Ancient Mesopotamia, 1964 The Medes were subsequently able to establish their Median kingdom (with as their royal centre) beyond their original homeland and had eventually a territory stretching roughly from northeastern Iran to the in . After the fall of the Assyrian Empire, between 616 BC and 605 BC, a unified Median state was formed, which, together with , , and , became one of the four major powers of the ancient Near East

Later on, in 550 BC, Cyrus the Great, would overthrow the leading Median rule, and conquer and the Babylonian Empire after which he established the Achaemenid Empire (or the First Persian Empire), while his successors would dramatically extend its borders. At its greatest extent, the Achaemenid Empire would encompass swaths of territory across three continents, namely Europe, Africa and Asia, stretching from the and proper in the west, to the in the east. The largest empire of , with their base in (although the main capital was located in Babylon) the Achaemenids would rule much of the known ancient world for centuries. This First Persian Empire was equally notable for its successful model of a centralised, bureaucratic administration (through under a king) and a government working to the profit of its subjects, for building infrastructure such as a and and the use of an official language across its territories and a large professional army and civil services (inspiring similar systems in later empires),Schmitt Achaemenid dynasty (i. The clan and dynasty) and for emancipation of slaves including the Jewish exiles in Babylon, and is noted in Western history as the antagonist of the during the Greco-Persian Wars. The Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, was built in the empire as well.

The Greco-Persian Wars resulted in the Persians being forced to withdraw from their territories, setting the direct further course of history of and the rest of Europe. More than a century later, a prince of Macedon (which itself was a subject to Persia from the late 6th century BC up to the First Persian invasion of Greece) later known by the name of Alexander the Great, overthrew the incumbent Persian king, by which the Achaemenid Empire was ended.

Old Persian is attested in the Behistun Inscription (c. 519 BC), recording a proclamation by Darius the Great. "Avestan , etymology and concept by Alexander Lubotsky" – Sprache und Kultur. Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 22.-28. September 1996, ed. W. Meid, Innsbruck (IBS) 1998, 479–488. . Retrieved 4 June 2006. In southwestern Iran, the kings usually wrote their inscriptions in trilingual form (, Babylonian and Old Persian)R. G. Kent, Old Persian: Grammar, texts and lexicon. while elsewhere other languages were used. The administrative languages were Elamite in the early period, and later ,R. Hallock (1969), Persepolis Fortification Tablets; A. L. Driver (1954), Aramaic Documents of the V Century BC. as well as , making it a widely used language. Greek and Iranian, E. Tucker, A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity, ed. Anastasios-Phoivos Christidēs, Maria Arapopoulou, Maria Chritē, (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 780. Even though the Achaemenids had extensive contacts with the Greeks and vice versa, and had conquered many of the Greek-speaking area's both in and during different periods of the empire, the native Old Iranian sources provide no indication of Greek linguistic evidence. However, there is plenty of evidence (in addition to the accounts of Herodotus) that Greeks, apart from being deployed and employed in the core regions of the empire, also evidently lived and worked in the heartland of the Achaemenid Empire, namely Iran. For example, Greeks were part of the various ethnicities that constructed Darius' palace in , apart from the Greek inscriptions found nearby there, and one short Persepolis tablet written in Greek.

The early inhabitants of the Achaemenid Empire appear to have adopted the religion of . "Kurdish: An Indo-European Language By Siamak Rezaei Durroei" – University of Edinburgh, School of Informatics. . Retrieved 4 June 2006. The who speak a west Iranian language relate an oral tradition regarding their migration from , around the year 1000 AD, whereas linguistic evidence links to , Soranî, Gorani and . "The Iranian Language Family, Khodadad Rezakhani" – Iranologie. . Retrieved 4 June 2006.


Eastern Iranian peoples
While the Iranian tribes of the south are better known through their texts and modern counterparts, the tribes which remained largely in the vast Eurasian expanse are known through the references made to them by the ancient Greeks, Persians, Chinese, and Indo-Aryans as well as by archaeological finds. The chronicler, (5th century BC) makes references to a nomadic people, the ; he describes them as having dwelt in what is today southern European Russia and . He was the first to make a reference to them. Many ancient texts from a later period make references to such tribes they were witness of pointing them towards the southeasternmost edges of Central Asia, around the range in northern Pakistan.

It is believed that these Scythians were conquered by their eastern cousins, the , who are mentioned by as the dominant tribe which controlled the southern Russian steppe in the 1st millennium AD. These Sarmatians were also known to the , who conquered the western tribes in the and sent Sarmatian conscripts, as part of Roman legions, as far west as . These Iranian-speaking Scythians and Sarmatians dominated large parts of for a millennium, and were eventually absorbed and assimilated (e.g. ) by the - population of the region.

The Sarmatians differed from the Scythians in their veneration of the god of fire rather than god of nature, and women's prominent role in warfare, which possibly served as the inspiration for the . At their greatest reported extent, around the 1st century AD, these tribes ranged from the to the mouth of the and eastward to the , bordering the shores of the and Seas as well as the to the south. Their territory, which was known as Sarmatia to Greco-Roman ethnographers, corresponded to the western part of greater Scythia (mostly modern and Southern Russia, also to a smaller extent north eastern Balkans around ). According to authors Arrowsmith, Fellowes and Graves Hansard in their book A Grammar of Ancient Geography published in 1832, Sarmatia had two parts, and Sarmatia Asiatica covering a combined area of 503,000 sq mi or 1,302,764 km2.

Throughout the 1st millennium AD, the large presence of the Sarmatians who once dominated Ukraine, , and swaths of the , gradually started to diminish mainly due to assimilation and absorption by the , especially from the areas near the Roman frontier, but only completely by the Proto-Slavic peoples. The abundant East Iranian-derived in proper (e.g. some of the largest rivers; the and ), as well as loanwords adopted predominantly through the Eastern Slavic languages and adopted aspects of Iranian culture amongst the early Slavs, are all a remnant of this. A connection between and Iranian languages is also furthermore proven by the earliest layer of in the former. For instance, the Proto-Slavonic words for god (*bogъ), demon (*divъ), house (*xata), axe (*toporъ) and dog (*sobaka) are of Scythian origin.

The extensive contact between these Scytho-Sarmatian Iranian tribes in Eastern Europe and the (Early) Slavs included religion. After Slavic and Baltic languages diverged the Early Slavs interacted with Iranian peoples and merged elements of Iranian spirituality into their beliefs. For example, both Early Iranian and Slavic supreme gods were considered givers of wealth, unlike the supreme thunder gods in many other European religions. Also, both Slavs and Iranians had demons –- given names from similar linguistic roots, Daêva (Iranian) and Divŭ (Slavic) –- and a concept of dualism, of good and evil.

The Sarmatians of the east, based in the Pontic–Caspian steppe, became the , who also ventured far and wide, with a branch ending up in and then , as they accompanied the Germanic and during their migrations. The modern are believed to be the direct descendants of the Alans, as other remnants of the Alans disappeared following Germanic, and ultimately Slavic migrations and invasions.A History of Russia by Nicholas Riasanovsky, pp. 11–18, Russia before the Russians, . Retrieved 4 June 2006. Another group of Alans allied with Goths to defeat the Romans and ultimately settled in what is now called Catalonia (Goth-Alania).The Sarmatians: 600 BC-AD 450 (Men-at-Arms) by Richard Brzezinski and Gerry Embleton, 19 August 2002

Some of the Saka-Scythian tribes in Central Asia would later move further southeast and invade the , large sections of present-day and finally deep into present day Pakistan (see ). Another Iranian tribe related to the Saka-Scythians were the in Central Asia, and who later become indistinguishable from the , speakers of a northwest-Iranian language. Many Iranian tribes, including the , and , were assimilated and/or displaced in Central Asia by the migrations of tribes emanating out of Xinjiang and Siberia. "Jeannine Davis-Kimball, Archaeologist" – Thirteen WNET New York. Retrieved 4 June 2006.

The modern Sarikoli in southern Xinjiang and the Ossetians of the (mainly and ) are remnants of the various Scythian-derived tribes from the vast far and wide territory they once dwelled in. The modern are the descendants of the Alano-Sarmatians,James Minahan, "One Europe, Many Nations", Published by Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000. pg 518: "The Ossetians, calling themselves Iristi and their homeland Iryston are the most northerly Iranian people. ... They are descended from a division of Sarmatians, the Alans who were pushed out of the Terek River lowlands and in the Caucasus foothills by invading Huns in the 4th century CE. and their claims are supported by their Northeast Iranian language, while culturally the Ossetians resemble their neighbors, the and .From Scythia to Camelot by Littleton and Malcor, pp. 40–43, . Retrieved 4 June 2006. Various extinct Iranian peoples existed in the eastern Caucasus, including the Azaris, while some Iranian peoples remain in the region, including the "Report for Talysh" – Ethnologue. Retrieved 4 June 2006. and the Tats "Report for Tats" – Ethnologue. . Retrieved 4 June 2006. found in Azerbaijan and as far north as the Russian republic of . A remnant of the Sogdians is found in the Yaghnobi-speaking population in parts of the Zeravshan valley in Tajikistan.


Later developments
The main of occurred between the 6th and 10th centuries, when they spread across most of . The Turkic peoples slowly replaced and assimilated the previous Iranian-speaking locals, turning the population of Central Asia from being largely into being primarily of East Asian descent.

Starting with the reign of in 634 AD, began a conquest of the Iranian Plateau. The Arabs conquered the of the Persians and seized much of the populated by the and others. Ultimately, the various Iranian peoples, including the Persians, Pashtuns, Kurds and Balochis, converted to , while the converted to , thus laying the foundation for the fact that the modern-day Ossetians are . The Iranian peoples would later split along sectarian lines as the Persians adopted the sect. As ancient tribes and identities changed, so did the Iranian peoples, many of whom assimilated foreign cultures and peoples.The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates by Hugh Kennedy, (retrieved 4 June 2006), p. 135

Later, during the 2nd millennium AD, the Iranian peoples would play a prominent role during the age of Islamic expansion and empire. , a noted adversary of the , was an ethnic , while various empires centered in Iran (including the ) re-established a modern dialect of Persian as the official language spoken throughout much of what is today Iran and the . Iranian influence was also an principal factor in the . The Ottoman Turks integrated Persian into their court, governance, and daily life. Supported by the sultans, nobility, and spiritual leaders, Persian was promoted as a second language, intertwining with Turkish and greatly influencing Ottoman cultural traditions. However, a heavy Turko-Persian basis in Anatolia was set already by the predecessors of the Ottomans, namely the Sultanate of Rum and Anatolian Beyliks amongst others) as well to the court of the . All of the major Iranian peoples reasserted their use of Iranian languages following the decline of Arab rule, but would not begin to form modern identities until the 19th and early 20th centuries.


Persian nationalism
The term "" (, ) is more often used in English partly due to the fact that "Iran" was known in the western world as "Persia". In 1959, the government of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Reza Shah's son, announced that both "Persia" and "Iran" could officially be used interchangeably.Yarshater, Ehsan Persia or Iran, Persian or Farsi , Iranian Studies, vol. XXII no. 1 (1989) Nowadays, the term "" mainly refers to those whose is and those who identify as Persian. However, Iran is a mosaic of ethnic and linguistic groups. Persians are said to make up roughly half the population (with some estimates reaching 60%), while the rest comprises Azeris, Arabs (e.g. ), , , , Mazanderanis, , , , Armenians, and others. Although many of these groups speak (Farsi) and identify as Iranian, their ethnic identity is distinct from being Persian. Additionally, Iran is home to various religious minorities—, , , Bahá’ís, , and others—some of whom identify as while others do not. The denial of this diversity stems not only from ignorance but also from Persian-centric nationalism rooted in mid-20th century Iranian state policies. This approach, particularly under the , sought to erase ethnic and linguistic diversity in favour of an .

Inspired by European and Turkish , Pahlavi's regime crafted an artificial narrative of Iranian history centered on Persian ethnic unity over 2,500 years. This contradicted the historical reality, as previous Iranian dynasties, such as the and , were of origin, and the Persian Empire itself historically united diverse peoples through imperial administration and as a rather than . This nationalistic approach extended as far as to the Gulf Arab states where the Iranian migrants lived; as such, anything that happened in that was annoying to these countries, the pressure was immediately put on Iranians living in Bahrain, in Kuwait, or the rest of the Gulf in general. Alt URL Reza Shah's policies were mainly influenced by , a -era linking with . This framework, which tied the Indo-European language family to an imagined migration of an Aryan nation, shaped nationalist projects in and . conveniently justified European colonial views of Indian and Persian civilizations while influencing Iranian nationalism to adopt an exclusionary identity framework. Author Mehran Kokherdi Author states that the term is used to refer to all groups with original Parsi roots, including the inhabitants of villages scattered across Persia who still speak their . However, the term has also come to describe the populations of major cities (e.g. , , ) more broadly, who consist of a blend of various ethnic groups, all unified by their use of —a that incorporates elements from , , , , Mongolian, and Parsi. Based on their shared language, the people of Iran generally identify them as . This leads many scholars to believe that the term "Iranian" is more encompassing and inclusive of these various ethnic groups (Iranic people, and ethnic groups in Iran).

(2025). 9780674044937, Harvard University Press.
It's worth noting that many groups such as the , do not refer to themselves as such (Persian), despite their Iranic/Iranian roots.


Demographics
There are an estimated 150 to 200 million native speakers of Iranian languages, the six major groups of , , , , , and accounting for about 90% of this number. Currently, most of these Iranian peoples live in , , the (mainly , other parts of Georgia, , and ), and majority populated areas of , and , , and . There are also Iranian peoples living in such as northern Oman, , and .

Due to recent migrations, there are also large communities of speakers of Iranian languages in and the .

+ List of Iranian peoples with the respective groups' core areas of settlements and their estimated sizes
? with a dialect known as & ( region)?
? with a Kabuli, Khorasani dialect ?
(Laristanis/Khodmoonis)Western Iranian, tribe (Ira and )/Lari, a Branch of Southwestern , in addition to (), and ()Primarily Southwestern (, ). Notable presence in Alt URL and Arab Gulf states , , , , ).0.5–1,000,000
Western Iranian, tribe (Pasargadean)Southwestern , , 72,000
, Mazanderanis And Western Iranian, Possibly / , Mazandrani, Branches of Northwestern /Parthian...Northwestern5–10,000,000
; ,
(2011). 9781845118754, I.B.Tauris.
,
Western Iranian, , Northwestern

Historical Homeland: , , , ( ) Notable presence in: , , , and .30–40,000,000 A rough estimate in this edition gives populations of 14.3 million in Turkey, 8.2 million in Iran, about 5.6 to 7.4 million in Iraq, and less than 2 million in Syria, which adds up to approximately 28–30 million Kurds in Kurdistan or in adjacent regions. The CIA estimates are – Turkey: Kurdish 18%, of 81.6 million; Iran: Kurd 10%, of 81.82 million; Iraq: Kurdish 15–20%, of 37.01 million, Syria: Kurds, Armenians, and other 9.7%, of 17.01 million.
FeyliWestern Iranian, possibly / Feyli or Ilami,1,500,000
Western Iranian, , , , and possibly Persians, a branch of Southwestern with close kinship to Historical Homeland: , Lorestan region. Notable presence in: , , (Bakhtiaris),
(2025). 9780549935070, The University of Arizona. .
and
.
026
6,000,000
Western Iranian, possibly / (?)Historial Homeland: & ( region) Notable presence in: , , , , , .
15
20–22,000,000
Iranian Azeris

  • Tats
Western Iranian, possibly / (extinct), , Tati,1.5,000,000
Eastern Iranian, and the . Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan : country studies Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, page 206 aka (, & ),8-15,000,000 (2024)
Eastern Iranian,
(2007). 9781845112837, I.B.Tauris. .
Yaghnobi language, a descendant of Eastern Iranian and ()25,000
Eastern Iranian, Various groups,60-70,000,000
Eastern Iranian, (), , tribes, as well as pre-Indo-European groups., , (),300,000–350,000
Eastern Iranian, tribe of the , an sub-tribe, which split off from .Ossetian language(South Ossetia), (),700,000
Various ?(Musandam)5,500 ~
Western Iranian? Persian tribes? (liturgical language), Zoroastrian Dari (Iranis),202,604 ~


Culture
Iranian culture is today considered to be centered in what is called the , and has its origins tracing back to the Andronovo culture of the late , which is associated with other cultures of the . It was, however, later developed distinguishably from its earlier generations in the Steppe, where a large number of Iranian-speaking peoples (i.e., the ) continued to participate, resulting in a differentiation that is displayed in Iranian mythology as the contrast between .

Like other Indo-Europeans, the early Iranians practiced ritual sacrifice, had a social hierarchy consisting of warriors, clerics, and farmers, and recounted their deeds through poetic hymns and sagas. Various common traits can be discerned among the Iranian peoples. For instance, the social event of is an ancient Iranian festival that is still celebrated by nearly all of the Iranian peoples. However, due to their different environmental adaptations through migration, the Iranian peoples embrace some degrees of diversity in dialect, social system, and other aspects of culture.

With numerous artistic, scientific, architectural, and philosophical achievements and numerous kingdoms and empires that bridged much of the civilized world in antiquity, the Iranian peoples were often in close contact with people from various western and eastern parts of the world.


Religion
The early Iranian peoples practiced the ancient Iranian religion, which, like that of other Indo-European peoples, embraced various male and female deities. Fire was regarded as an important and highly sacred element, and also . In ancient Iran, fire was kept with great care in . Various annual festivals that were mainly related to agriculture and herding were celebrated, the most important of which was the New Year (Nowruz), which is still widely celebrated. , a form of the ancient Iranian religion that is still practiced by some communities, was later developed and spread to nearly all of the Iranian peoples living in the Iranian Plateau. Other religions that had their origins in the Iranian world were , , and , among others. The various religions of the Iranian peoples are believed by some scholars to have been significant early philosophical influences on and .
(1982). 9780521289269, Cambridge University Press.

Nowadays, most Iranian people follow Islam (Sunnism, followed by Shi'ism), with minorities following Christianity, Judaism, , Iranian religions and various levels of irreligion.


Cultural assimilation
Iranian languages were and, to a lesser extent, still are spoken in a wide area comprising regions around the , the , , Russia and the . This population was linguistically assimilated by smaller but dominant Turkic-speaking groups, while the sedentary population eventually adopted the , which began to spread within the region since the time of the Sasanian Empire. The language-shift from Middle Iranian to Turkic and New Persian was predominantly the result of an "elite dominance" process. Moreover, various Turkic-speaking ethnic groups of the Iranian Plateau are often conversant also in an Iranian language and embrace Iranian culture to the extent that the term would be applied.
(2025). 9780521522915, Cambridge University Press. .
A number of Iranian peoples were also intermixed with the , and many were subjected to .

The following either partially descend from or are sometimes regarded as descendants of the Iranian peoples.

    • : In spite of being native speakers of a Turkic language (Azerbaijani Turkic), they are believed to be primarily descended from the earlier Iranian-speakers of the region.
      (2025). 9781845115524, I.B. Tauris. .
      They are possibly related to the ancient Iranian tribe of the , aside from the rise of the subsequent and (changing of the native Iranian language) within their area of settlement, which, prior to the spread of Turkic, was Iranian-speaking. Thus, due to their historical, genetic and cultural ties to the Iranians, the Azerbaijanis are often associated with the Iranian peoples. Genetic studies observed that they are also genetically related to the Iranian peoples.
    • : Genetic studies show that the Turkmens are characterized by the presence of local Iranian mtDNA lineages, similar to the eastern Iranian populations, but modest female mtDNA components were observed in Turkmen populations with the frequencies of about 20%.
    • : The unique grammatical and phonetical features of the , as well as elements within the modern Uzbek culture, reflect the older Iranian roots of the Uzbek people. According to recent genetic genealogy testing from a University of Oxford study, the genetic admixture of the Uzbeks clusters somewhere between the Iranian peoples and the Mongols. Prior to the Russian conquest of Central Asia, the local ancestors of the Turkic-speaking Uzbeks and the Persian-speaking Tajiks, both living in Central Asia, were referred to as , while Uzbek and Turk were the names given to the nomadic and semi-nomadic populations of the area. Still, as of today, modern Uzbeks and Tajiks are known to their Turkic neighbors, the and the , as Sarts. Some Uzbek scholars also favor the Iranian origin theory. However, another study, conducted in 2009, claims that Uzbeks and Central Asian Turkic peoples cluster genetically and are far from Iranian groups.
    • : Contemporary scholars consider modern Uyghurs to be the descendants of, apart from the ancient Uyghurs, the Iranian () tribes and other Indo-European peoples who inhabited the before the arrival of the Turkic tribes.
      (2025). 9780765613189, M.E. Sharpe.
  • Persian-speakers:
    • The are a Persian-speaking ethnic group native to, and primarily residing in, the mountainous region of , in central Afghanistan. Although the origins of the Hazara people have not been fully reconstructed, genetic analysis of the Hazara indicate partial ancestry. Mongol and Turkic invaders (Turco-Mongols) mixed with the local indigenous Turkic and Iranian populations; for example, Qara'unas settled in what is now Afghanistan and mixed with the local populations. A second wave of mostly Turco-Mongols came from Central Asia, associated with the and the , all of whom settled in Hazarajat and mixed with the local populations. Phenotype can vary, with some noting that certain Hazaras may resemble peoples native to the Iranian plateau.B. Campbell, Disappearing people? Indigenous groups and ethnic minorities in South and Central Asia in: Barbara Brower, Barbara Rose Johnston (Ed.) International Mountain Society, California, 2007Kieffer, Charles M. "HAZĀRA" iv.. Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
  • -speakers:
    • and : Some scholars suggest that the Slavic-speaking Serbs and Croats are descended from the ancient , an ancient Iranian people who once settled in most of southern European Russia and the eastern , and that their ethnonyms are of Iranian origin. It is proposed that the Sarmatian and alleged Horoathos tribes were assimilated with the numerically superior Slavs, passing on their name. Iranian-speaking peoples did inhabit parts of the Balkans in late classical times, and would have been encountered by the Slavs. An archaeogenetic IBD study found that the Slavs make a specific and recognisable genetic cluster which "was formed by admixture of a Baltic-related group with East Germanic people and or ". Although previous direct linguistic, historical, or archaeological proof for such a theory is lacking.
  • -speakers:
  • Indo-Aryan speakers:
    • : About 40% of Pakistan's Baloch population lives in , many of whom speak . It is believed that the first Baloch came to Sindh during the Little Ice Age, with further waves of migration during the 18th century. The was an ethnic dynasty that ruled much of Sindh and parts of during the . The industrialisation of under drew further migrants from Balochistan, including Baloch fleeing and and Afro-Baloch Makranis. The Baloch in Sindh are known as the (rtl=yes).


Genetics
Recent population genomic studies found that the genetic structure of Iranian peoples formed already about 5,000 years ago and show high continuity since then, suggesting that they were largely unaffected by migration events from outside groups. Genetically speaking, Iranian peoples generally cluster closely with and other Middle Eastern peoples. Analyzed samples of Iranian , , , , , and cluster tightly together, forming a single cluster known as the CIC (Central Iranian cluster). Compared with worldwide populations, Iranians (CIC) cluster in the center of the wider West-Eurasian cluster, close to Europeans, Middle Easterners, and South-Central Asians. Iranian Arabs and Azeris genetically overlap with Iranian peoples. The genetic substructure of Iranians is low and homogeneous, compared with other "1000G" populations. Europeans, and certain South Asians (specifically the Parsi minority) showed the highest affinity with Iranians, while Sub-Saharan Africans and East Asians showed the highest differentiation with Iranians.

The BMAC population largely derived from preceding local peoples who were in turn related to Neolithic farmers from the and to a lesser extent early Anatolian farmers, as well as West Siberian hunter-gatherers. The samples extracted from the BMAC sites did not have derived any part of their ancestry from the people, who are associated with Proto-Indo-Europeans, although some peripheral samples did already carry significant Yamnaya-like Western Steppe Herders ancestry, inline with the southwards expansion of Western Steppe Herders from the Sintashta and Andronovo cultures towards Southern Central Asia at c. 2100 BCE.

The of Margiana, Bactria and Sogdia was characterised by a combination of BMAC and Andronovo ancestries. Likewise, a 2022 study also shows that the ancestry of modern and largely formed during the early Iron Age by a mixture between these two groups.


Paternal haplogroups
Regueiro et al (2006) and Grugni et al (2012) have performed large-scale sampling of Y chromosome haplogroups of different ethnic groups within Iran. They found that the most common paternal haplogroups were:
  • J1-M267; commonly found among people, was rarely over 10% in Iranian groups.
  • J2-M172: is the most common Hg in Iran (~23%); almost exclusively represented by J2a-M410 subclade (93%), the other major sub-clade being J2b-M12. Apart from Iranians, J2 is common in northern Arabs, Mediterranean and Balkan peoples (Croats, Serbs, Greeks, Bosniaks, Albanians, Italians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, Turks), in the Caucasus (Armenians, Georgians, Chechens, Ingush, northeastern Turkey, north/northwestern Iran, Kurds, Persians); whilst its frequency drops suddenly beyond Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India. In Europe, J2a is more common in southern Greece and southern Italy; whilst J2b (J2-M12) is more common in Thessaly, Macedonia and central – northern Italy. Thus J2a and its subgroups within it have a wide distribution from Italy to India, whilst J2b is mostly confined to the Balkans and Italy, being rare even in Turkey. Whilst closely linked with Anatolia and the Levant; and putative agricultural expansions, the distribution of the various sub-clades of J2 likely represents a number of migrational histories which require further elucidation.
  • R1a-M198: is common in Iran, more so in the east and south rather than the west and north; suggesting a migration toward the south to India then a secondary westward spread across Iran.Regueiro, 2006 Whilst the Grongi and Regueiro studies did not define exactly which sub-clades Iranian R1a haplogrouops belong to, private genealogy tests suggest that they virtually all belong to "Eurasian" R1a-Z93. Indeed, population studies of neighbouring Indian groups found that they all were in R1a-Z93. This implies that R1a in Iran did not descend from "European" R1a, or vice versa. Rather, both groups are collateral, brother branches which descend from a parental group hypothesized to have initially lived somewhere between central Asia and Eastern Europe.
  • R1b – M269: is widespread from Ireland to Iran, and is common in highland West Asian populations such as Armenians, Turks and Iranians – with an average frequency of 8.5%. Iranian R1b belongs to the L-23 subclade,Grugni, 2013. which is an older than the derivative subclade (R1b-M412) which is most common in western Europe.
  • Haplogroup G and subclades: most concentrated in the Caucasus, it is present in 10% of Iranians.
  • Haplogroup E and various subclades are frequently found among Middle Easterners, Europeans, northern and eastern African populations. They are present in less than 10% of Iranians.

Two large – scale papers by Haber (2012) and Di Cristofaro (2013) analyzed populations from Afghanistan, where several Iranian-speaking groups are native. They found that different groups (e.g. Baluch, Hazara, Pashtun) were quite diverse, yet overall:

  • R1a (subclade not further analyzed) was the predominant haplogroup, especially amongst Pashtuns, the Baloch and Tajiks.
  • The presence of "East-Eurasian" haplogroup C3, especially in Hazaras (33–40%), in part linked to Mongol expansions into the region.
  • The presence of haplogroup J2, like in Iran, of 5–20%.
  • A relative paucity of "Indian" haplogroup H (< 10%).
A 2012 study by Grugni et al. analyzed the haplogroups of 15 different ethnic groups from Iran. They found that about 31.4% belong to J, 29.1% belong to R, 11.8% belong to G, and 9.2% belong to E. They found that Iranian ethnic groups display high haplogroup diversity, compared to other Middle Easterners. The authors concluded that the Iranian gene pool has been an important source for the Middle Eastern and Eurasian Y chromosome diversity, and the results suggest that there was already rather high Y chromosome diversity during the Neolithic period, placing Iranian populations in between Europeans, Middle Easterners and South Asians.

A 2024 study by Vallini et al. stated that ancient and modern populations in the Iranian plateau have a similar genetic component to the Ancient West Eurasian lineage which stayed in the 'population hub' (WEC2). But they also display some ancestry from and Ancient East Eurasians via contact events starting in the .


See also
  • List of ancient Iranian peoples
  • List of geographic names of Iranian origin


Explanatory notes

Citations

Works cited

  • (2009). 9780691135892, Princeton University Press. .

  • Canfield, Robert (ed.). Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).

  • Kennedy, Hugh. The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates, Longman, New York, NY (2004).
  • (2025). 9789047420712, Brill.

  • .

  • Riasanovsky, Nicholas. A History of Russia, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004). .

General references
  • Banuazizi, Ali and Weiner, Myron (eds.). The State, Religion, and Ethnic Politics: Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan (Contemporary Issues in the Middle East), Syracuse University Press (August 1988). .
  • Derakhshani, Jahanshah. Die Arier in den nahöstlichen Quellen des 3. und 2. Jahrtausends v. Chr., 2nd edition (1999). .
  • Frye, Richard. Persia, Schocken Books, Zurich (1963). ASIN B0006BYXHY.
  • Khoury, Philip S. & Kostiner, Joseph. Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, University of California Press (1991). .
  • McDowall, David. A Modern History of the Kurds, I.B. Tauris, 3rd Rev edition (2004). .
  • Nassim, J. Afghanistan: A Nation of Minorities, Minority Rights Group, London (1992). .
  • Sims-Williams, Nicholas. Indo-Iranian Languages and People, British Academy (2003). .


Further reading

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
5s Time